DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN
Docket No: 1156-14
24 March 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
, naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
Although your application was not filed ina timely manner, the
Board found it .in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and consider your application on its merits. A
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
3 March 2015. The names and votes of the members of: the panel
will be furnished upon request.
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was- insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 8 May 2002. on 29 July 2008, you received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) for two instances of assault. You received a
reduction in paygrade, restriction, extra duty, and a suspended
forfeiture of pay. You remained on active to. until you were
honorably transferred to the Temporarily Disability Retired List
(TDRL) on 29 April 2009. on 29 April 2014, your named was
removed from the TDRL and placed on the Permanent Disability
Retired List (PDRL).
The Board, in its review of your entire record@ and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your record of service, desire to be restored to paygrade E-5,
and assertion that your diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on active duty.
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant restoring you to paygrade E-S.
Additionally, a report of inquiry into your mental capacity and
mental responsibility conducted by medical personnel found, in
part, that you had an average to above-average level of
intelligence, had the mental capacity to understand the nature of
proceedings and seriousness of the charges against you, and had
the mental capacity to cooperate intelligently in your own
defense. Regarding your assertion that you were suffering from
PTSD when your misconduct occurred, the Board noted that the
severity of your misconduct outweighed the mitigations of your
diagnosed PTSD. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. .
Sincerely
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1156 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, desire to be restored to paygrade E-5, and assertion that your diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on active duty. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4626 14
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR510 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1813 14
At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service, The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, Vietnam service , desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion that your post service diagnosed Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on active duty. The policy specifically...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10851 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10851 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1004 14
A. three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together: with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so ‘discharge on 10 November 1992. : The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1004 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5880 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2015. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence of PTSD in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10758 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence of PTSD in your case.